Publication:
Collaborative and Inclusive Process with the Autism Community: A Case Study in Colombia About Social Robot Design

Thumbnail Image
Files

Files

Collaborative and Inclusive Process with the Autism Community.pdf (1.64 MB)
View Statistics
Reference Managers
Mendeley
Indexers
Google Scholar CORE
QR Code
QR Code
Authors

Authors

Ramírez Duque, Andrés A.
Aycardi, Luis F.
Villa, Adriana
Múnera, Marcela
Bastos, Teodiano
Belpaeme, Tony
Frizera Neto, Anselmo
Cifuentes, Carlos A.
Abstract (Spanish)
Uno de los ámbitos más prometedores en los que se ha introducido la robótica de asistencia social es la intervención terapéutica en niños con trastornos del espectro autista (CwASD). Aunque hay resultados prometedores en contextos terapéuticos, falta directrices sobre cómo seleccionar el robot apropiado y cómo diseñar e implementar la interacción niño-robot. el uso de Los métodos de diseño participativo (PD) en el diseño de procesos basados ​​en tecnología para CwASD son un reconocimiento de las partes interesadas. como “expertos” en sus campos. Este trabajo explora los beneficios que aporta el uso de métodos de PD en el diseño de un robot social. con un enfoque específico en su uso en terapias de trastornos del espectro autista en la comunidad autista colombiana. Residencia en Lo que resultó ser efectivo en nuestra investigación anterior, implementamos métodos participativos tanto para el CwASD como para el partes interesadas. El proceso aprovecha el papel activo de los participantes mediante un enfoque de grupo focal con padres y especialistas. y fichas de escenas, métodos narrativos y generativos artesanales con los niños. Para superar algunos desafíos de la tradicional Procesos de DP, donde no se consideran todos los actores comunitarios, incluimos una comunidad colombiana conformada por terapeutas, enfermeras, cuidadores y padres. El proceso de desarrollo profesional propuesto brinda la oportunidad de aprender de varios actores comunitarios. (y, por tanto, diferentes aspectos culturales y sociales de los países en desarrollo), mejorando los métodos tradicionales de diseño de robots. en esto De esta manera, los hallazgos se resumen a través de un conjunto de pautas sobre el diseño de un dispositivo-robot social adecuado para ser implementado para la terapia asistida por robot para CwASD.
Abstract (English)
One of the most promising areas in which social assistive robotics has been introduced is therapeutic intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders (CwASD). Even though there are promising results in therapeutic contexts, there is a lack of guidelines on how to select the appropriate robot and how to design and implement the child–robot interaction. The use of participatory design (PD) methods in the design of technology-based processes for CwASD is a recognition of the stakeholders as “experts” in their fields. This work explores the benefits brought by the use of PD methods in the design of a social robot, with a specific focus on their use in autism spectrum disorders therapies on the Colombian autism community. Based on what proved to be effective in our previous research, we implemented participatory methods for both the CwASD and the stakeholders. The process leverages the active role of participants using a focus group approach with parents and specialists, and scene cards, narrative and handmade generative methods with the children. To overcome some challenges of traditional PD processes, where not all community actors are considered, we included a Colombian community consisting of therapists, nurses, caregivers and parents. The proposed PD process provides an opportunity to learn from several community actors (and thus different cultural and social aspects of developing countries), improving traditional robot design methods. In this way, the findings are summarized through a set of guidelines regarding the design of a social robot-device suitable to be implemented for robot-assisted therapy for CwASD.
Extent
15 páginas
URI: https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/3325
Collections

Collections

AA. Gibiome
References

Association, A.P.: DSM-5 diagnostic classification. In: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American psychiatric association (2013). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books. 9780890425596.x00DiagnosticClassification

Baio J, Wiggins L, Christensen DL, Maenner MJ, Daniels J, Warren Z, Kurzius-Spencer M, Zahorodny W, Robinson C, Rosenberg CT, White T, Durkin MS, Imm P, Nikolaou L, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Lee LC, Harrington R, Lopez M, Fitzgerald RT, Hewitt A, Pettygrove S, Constantino JN, Vehorn A, Shenouda J, Hall-Lande J, Van K, Naarden Braun, Dowling NF (2018) Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ 67(6):1–23. https://doi.org/ 10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1

Belpaeme T, Baxter PE, Read R, Wood R, Cuayáhuitl H, Kiefer B, Racioppa S, Kruijff-Korbayová I, Athanasopoulos G, Enescu V, Looije R, Neerincx M, Demiris Y, Ros-Espinoza R, Beck A, Cañamero L, Hiolle A, Lewis M, Baroni I, Nalin M, Cosi P, Paci G, Tesser F, Sommavilla G, Humbert R (2012) Multimodal child– robot interaction: building social bonds. J Hum Robot Interact 1(2):33–53. https://doi.org/10.5898/jhri.v1i2.62

Benton L, Vasalou A, Khaled R, Johnson H, Gooch D (2014) Diversity for design: a framework for involving neurodiverse children in the technology design process. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’14, pp 3747–3756. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557244

Bertel LB, Rasmussen DM, Christiansen E (2013) Robots for real: developing a participatory design framework for implementing educational robots in real-world learning environments. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) 8118 LNCS (Part 2), pp 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642- 40480-1_29

Cabibihan JJ, Javed H, Ang M, Aljunied SM (2013) Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 5(4):593–618. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2

Costescu CA, Vanderborght B, David DO (2014) Reversal learning task in children with autism spectrum disorder: a robot-based approach. J Autism Dev Disord 45(11):3715–3725. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10803-014-2319-z

David DO, Costescu CA, Matu S, Szentagotai A, Dobrean A (2018) Developing joint attention for children with autism in robot-enhanced therapy. Int J Soc Robot. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12369-017-0457-0

Eggebrecht AT, Elison JT, Feczko E, Todorov A, Wolff JJ, Kandala S, Adams CM, Snyder AZ, Lewis JD, Estes AM, Zwaigenbaum L, Botteron KN, McKinstry RC, Constantino JN, Evans A, Hazlett HC, Dager S, Paterson SJ, Schultz RT, Styner MA, Gerig G, Das S, Kostopoulos P, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE, Piven J, Pruett JR (2017) Joint attention and brain functional connectivity in infants and toddlers. Cereb Cortex 27(3):1709–1720. https://doi.org/10. 1093/cercor/bhw403

Feil-Seifer D, Matari´c MJ (2009) Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Springer Tracts Adv Robot 54:201–210. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-642-00196-3_24

Fletcher-Watson S, Adams J, Brook K, Charman T, Crane L, Cusack J, Leekam S, Milton D, Parr JR, Pellicano E (2018) Making the future together: shaping autism research through meaningful participation. Autism. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1362361318786721

Frauenberger C, Good J, Keay-BrightW (2011) Designing technology for children with special needs: bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign 7(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15710882.2011.587013

Guha M, Druin A, Fails J (2014) Cooperative inquiry revisited: reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. Int J Child-Comput Interact 1:14–23. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003

Heerink M, Vanderborght B, Broekens J, Albó-Canals J (2016) New friends: social robots in therapy and education. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):443–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0374-7

Hendriks N, Slegers K, Duysburgh P (2015) Codesign with people living with cognitive or sensory impairments: a case for method stories and uniqueness. CoDesign 11(1):70–82. https://doi.org/10. 1080/15710882.2015.1020316 Hendriks N, Slegers K, Duysburgh P (2015) Codesign with people living with cognitive or sensory impairments: a case for method stories and uniqueness. CoDesign 11(1):70–82. https://doi.org/10. 1080/15710882.2015.1020316

Huijnen CAGJ, Lexis MA, Jansens R, de Witte LP (2017) How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. J Autism Dev Disord 47(10):3079–3096. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10803-017-3235-9

Huijnen CAGJ, Lexis MAS, Jansens R, de Witte LP (2016) Mapping robots to therapy and educational objectives for children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 46(6):2100–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2740-6

Huijnen CAGJ, Lexis MAS, de Witte LP (2016) Matching robot KASPAR to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) therapy and educational goals. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):445–455. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s12369-016-0369-4

Kim E, Paul R, Shic F, Scassellati B (2012) Bridging the research gap: making HRI useful to individuals with autism. J Hum Robot Interact 1(1):26–54. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Kim

Kim ES, Berkovits LD, Bernier EP, Leyzberg D, Shic F, Paul R, Scassellati B (2013) Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord 43(5):1038– 1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1645-2

Kumazaki H, Yoshikawa Y, Yoshimura Y, Ikeda T, Hasegawa C, Saito DN, Tomiyama S, An KM, Shimaya J, Ishiguro H,Matsumoto Y, Minabe Y, Kikuchi M (2018) The impact of robotic intervention on joint attention in children with autism spectrum disorders. Mol Autism 9(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-018-0230-8

Malinverni L, MoraGuiard J, Padillo V, Mairena M, Hervás A, Pares N (2014) Participatory design strategies to enhance the creative contribution of children with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children—IDC ’14, pp 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2593981

Merter S, Hasirci D (2016) A participatory product design process with children with autism spectrum disorder. CoDesign 14(3):70– 187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2016.1263669

Peca A, Simut R, Pintea S, Costescu C, Vanderborght B (2014) How do typically developing children and children with autism perceive different social robots? Comput Hum Behav 41:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.035

Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2014) Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: novel play scenario implementations with children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 6(3):397–415. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12369-014-0228-0

A roadmap for U.S. robotics: from internet to robotics (2013) Georgia Institute of Technology. http://archive2.cra.org/ccc/files/docs/ 2013-Robotics-Roadmap

Saldien J, Goris K, Vanderborght B, Vanderfaeillie J, Lefeber D (2010) Expressing emotions with the social robot probo. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):377–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0067-6

Scassellati B, Boccanfuso L, Huang CM, Mademtzi M, Qin M, Salomons N, Ventola P, Shic F (2018) Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Sci Robot 3(21):eaat7544

Scassellati B, Admoni H, Matari´c MJ (2012) Robots for use in autism research. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 14(1):275–294. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036

Shick A (2013) Romibo robot project. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2013 studio talks on—SIGGRAPH ’13, ACM Press, New York, pp 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2503673.2503689

Vallès-Peris N, Angulo C, Domènech M (2018) Children’s imaginaries of human–robot interaction in healthcare. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 15(5):970. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050970

Yun SS, Choi J, Park SK, Bong GY, Yoo H (2017) Social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder using a robotic behavioral intervention system. Autism Res 10(7):1306–1323. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1778

Zubrycki I, Kolesinski M, Granosik G (2016) A participatory design for enhancing the work environment of therapists of disabled children. In: 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, New York, pp 781–786. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745208