Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPaz Penagos, Hernán
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-19T17:08:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T17:19:06Z
dc.date.available2021-05-19T17:08:33Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T17:19:06Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2382-4700
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/1439
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Recent studies on the FFT processing (Fast Fourier Transform) or DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) of the OFDM signal (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) have shown pros and cons for DVB-T2 (Digital Video Broadcasting-Second Generation Terrestrial) radio communications; however, the benefits of both types of processing have yet to be compared for the same scenario. Objective− The objective of this research is to compare the response of the wireless channel with AWGN noise (Additive White Gaussian Noise Channel) and Rayleigh and Rician fading in the UHF (Ultra High Frequency) band. Methodology: The transmission of DVB-T2 information with OFDM modulation and FFT and DWT processing was simulated in Matlab®, specifically in Simulink. Results: The results of the study proved to be more ef-ficient for DWT system than FFT system, due to the low rate of erroneous bits, spectral efficiency and reduction of the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR), for Eb / No relations greater than 10dB. Conclusions: In this article, we present the designs of both systems and the results of the research experience; likewise, the practical applicability of these systems is discussed, and improvements are suggested for future workeng
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: Recientes estudios sobre el procesado FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) o DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) de la señal OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) han demostrado pros y contras para comunicaciones de radio DVB-T2 (Digital Video Broadcasting – Second Generation Terrestrial); sin embargo, aún falta comparar las prestaciones de ambos tipos de procesamiento para el mismo escenario. Objetivo: El objetivo de esta investigación es comparar la respuesta del canal inalámbrico con ruido AWGN (Additive White Gaussian Noise Channel) y desvanecimiento Rayleigh y Rician en la banda de UHF (Ultra High Frequency). Metodología: Se simuló en Matlab®, específicamente en Simulink, la transmisión de información DVB-T2 con modulación OFDM y procesado FFT y DWT. Resultados: Los resultados del estudio demostraron ser más eficientes para el sistema DWT en comparación con el Sistema FFT, por la baja tasa de bits errados, eficiencia espectral y reducción del cociente entre la potencia pico a promedio (PAPR: Peak-to-Average Power Ratio), para relaciones Eb/No mayores a 10dB. Conclusiones: En este artículo se presentan los diseños de ambos sistemas y los resultados de la experiencia de investigación; así mismo, se discute la aplicabilidad práctica de estos sistemas y se sugieren mejoras para trabajos futuros.spa
dc.format.extent9 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de la Costaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/view/1588spa
dc.titleOFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channelseng
dc.title.alternativeComparación OFDM con procesado FFT y DWT para canales inalámbricos DVB-T2spa
dc.typeArtículo de periódicospa
dc.description.notesEscuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito. Bogotá, (Colombia) hernan.paz@escuelaing.edu.cospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupEcitrónicaspa
dc.identifier.doi10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
dc.publisher.placeBarranquilla, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.citationeditionVol. 14 no. 2, Julio - Diciembre, 2018.spa
dc.relation.citationendpage105spa
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage97spa
dc.relation.citationvolume14spa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalINGE CUCspa
dc.relation.referencesM. Kolomytsey, A. Lipatov and A. Lyagoskin, “Statement of Problem for Synchronous Digital Television Network Planning”, CriMiCo, 2007, pp. 287-288.spa
dc.relation.referencesK. Abdullah and Z. Hussain, “Studies on DWT-OFDM and FFT-OFDM Systems”, ICCCP, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesK. Abdullah and Z. Hussain, “Impulsive Noise Effects on DWT- and WPTOFDM versus FFT-OFDM”, ICCCP, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Cherubini, E. Eleftheriou and S. Oelser, “Filtered Multitone Modulation for High-Speed DSL”, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 20, no. 5, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2002.1007382spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Paz, Digital communications systems, Bogotá DC, Colombia: Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesL. Schulze, Theory and Applications of OFDM and CDMA–Wideband Wireless Communications, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2005, pp. 408. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470017406spa
dc.relation.referencesETSI Technical Specification, “Digital Video Broadcasting: System Specifications for Satellite Services to Handheld Devices (SH) below 3GHz”, ETSI TS 102-585, V.1.1.1, 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesETSI European Standard, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): Second generation framing structure, cannel coding and modulation systems for Broadcasting, Interactive Services, News Gathering and other broadband satellite applications (DVB-S2)”, EN 302 307 V. 1.2.1, 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. García, S. Ruiz and F. Minerva, “Static delays optimization to reduce self-interference in DVB-T networks. Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)”, IEEE PIMRC, 2010, pp. 1-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Dilmirghani and M. Ghavami, “Wavelet Vs Fourier Based UWB Systems”, IEEE PIMRC, 2007, pp. 1-5.spa
dc.relation.referencesD. Gupta, H. Torry, V. Vats and K. Garg, “Performance Analysis of DFT-OFDM, DCT-OFDM and DWT-OFDM Systems in AWGN Channel”, ICWMC, 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Baig, U. Rehman and M. Mughal, “Performance comparison of DFT, discrete wavelet packet and wavelet transforms, in an OFDM transceiver for multipath fading channel”, in Proc. INMIC, 2005, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INMIC.2005.334509spa
dc.relation.referencesW. Saad, N. El-Fishawy, S. El-Rabaie and M. Shokair, “An Efficient Technique for OFDM System Using Discrete Wavelet Transform”. In: Bellavista P., Chang RS., Chao HC., Lin SF., Sloot P.M.A. (eds) Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing. GPC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 6104, pp. 533-541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Gonzáles, N. Pérez, J. Paredes, J. Uzcategui, J. Pena, L. da Silva, R. Lima and L. Silva, “Measurements of Terrestrial Digital TV Signals at Two Cities in South America”, EUCAP, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesACIEM, “¿Qué aspectos técnicos debe contener el DVBT2?”, ACIEM, Vol. 114, pp. 21-23, March 2012.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.subject.armarcSistemas de comunicación inalámbricaspa
dc.subject.armarcWireless communication systemseng
dc.subject.proposalWireless channeleng
dc.subject.proposalAWGN noiseeng
dc.subject.proposalFadingeng
dc.subject.proposalBroadband communicationseng
dc.subject.proposalDWT and FFTeng
dc.subject.proposalCanal inalámbricospa
dc.subject.proposalRuido AWGNspa
dc.subject.proposalDes-vanecimientosspa
dc.subject.proposalComunicaciones de banda anchaspa
dc.subject.proposalProcesado FFT y DWTspa
dc.subject.proposalDesempeñospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/