Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorVega, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Nancy
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-28T15:41:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T17:46:31Z
dc.date.available2021-05-28T15:41:20Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T17:46:31Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2248-8723
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/1512
dc.description.abstractIn many countries, buildings are usually made of unreinforced clay masonry walls, especially in Colombia. These constructions have low resistance and ductility, and are very vulnerable to seismic events, due to their low capacity of energy dissipation. This paper reports the results obtained from a research project that evaluates the behavior of reinforced masonry walls under lateral loads. The reinforcement was made using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRP). In the test program, eight (8) clay masonry walls were built using hollow brick. Four (4) of them were 1,23 m long and 1,90 m high and the remaining four (4) were 2,47 m long and 1,90 m high. Four (4) walls were tested with a static lateral load and four (4) with a cyclic lateral load in its plane. Results revealed that the presence of the reinforcement material significantly increased the ultimate load and deformation capacity, provided that the material has a suitable anchoring system.eng
dc.description.abstractLa construcción de viviendas con muros de mampostería en arcilla no reforzada es tradicional en muchos países, en especial en Colombia. Debido a su baja resistencia y ductilidad, estas edificaciones son muy vulnerables a eventos sísmicos como consecuencia de su poca capacidad de disipación de energía, lo que genera fallas que llevan incluso al colapso total. Este artículo expone los resultados de un proyecto de investigación donde se evaluó el comportamiento ante cargas laterales en muros de mampostería no estructural, reforzados mediante polímeros reforzados con fibra de carbono (CFRP). En el programa experimental, se construyeron ocho (8) muros de mampostería de arcilla, utilizando bloque de perforación horizontal. Cuatro (4) de ellos tenían dimensiones de 1,23 m de largo por 1,90 m de alto y los cuatro (4) restantes de 2,47 m de largo por 1,90 m de alto. Cuatro (4) muros se probaron ante carga lateral estática y cuatro (4) ante carga lateral cíclica en su plano. Los resultados muestran que el material de refuerzo mejoró significativamente la capacidad de carga y deformación última de los muros, siempre y cuando se tenga un adecuado sistema de anclaje.spa
dc.format.extent9 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/73151spa
dc.titleExternal strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls with polymers reinforced with carbon fibereng
dc.title.alternativeReforzamiento externo de muros de mampostería no reforzada mediante polímeros reforzados con fibra de carbonospa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.description.notes1 Civil Engineer, M.Sc. in Civil Engineering, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito, Colombia. Affiliation: Instructor Professor, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito. E-mail: camilo.vega@escuelaing.edu.co. 2 Civil Engineer, Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Colombia. Ph.D. Materials Science and Technology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Co-lombia. Affiliation: Associate Professor, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Ju-lio Garavito, Colombia. E-mail: nancy.torres@escuelaing.edu.cospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupEstructuras y Materialesspa
dc.identifier.doi10.15446/ing.investig.v38n3.73151
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v38n3.73151
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.citationeditionIngeniería e Investigación, Vol. 38 no. 3, december - 2018 (15-23).spa
dc.relation.citationendpage23spa
dc.relation.citationissue3spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage15spa
dc.relation.citationvolume38spa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalIngeniería e Investigaciónspa
dc.relation.referencesACI, Committee 440. (2010). 440.7R-10: Guide for the design and Construction of externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer systems for strengthening unreinforced masonry structures. (7 ed). Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute.spa
dc.relation.referencesArifuzzaman, S. & Saatcioglu, M. (2012). Seismic retrofit of load bearing masonry walls by FRP sheets and anchors. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portuguese Earthquake Engineering Community. Retrieved from http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/WCEE2012_4501.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesASCE 7-16. (2017). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineersspa
dc.relation.referencesASCE 41-13. (2014). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineersspa
dc.relation.referencesCapozzuca, R. (2011). Experimental analysis of historic masonry walls reinforced by CFRP under in-plane cyclic loading. Composite Structures 94(1), 277-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.007spa
dc.relation.referencesElgawady, M., Lestuzzi, P., & Bardoux, M. (2006). Aseismic retrofitting of unreinforced masonry walls using FRP. Composites Part B: Engineering, 37(2-3), 148-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.06.003spa
dc.relation.referencesFEMA 461. (2007). Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Non structural Components. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Retrieved from https://www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/FEMA461.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFOPAE - Fondo de Prevención y Atención de Emergencias. (2010). Visita técnica comisión de dirección de prevención y atención de emergencias - FOPAE - San Pedro de la Paz - Concepción – Chile. Informe técnico. Bogotá D.C.: Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá. Retrieved from https://docplayer.es/4541826-Visita-tecnica-comision-de-direccion-de-prevencion-y-atencion-de-emergencias-fopae-san-pedro-de-la-paz-concepcion-chile-informe-tecnico.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesGabor, A, Bennani, A, Jacquelin, E, & Lebon, F. (2006). Modelling approaches of the in-plane shear behaviour of unreinforced and FRP strengthened masonry panels. Composite Structures, 74 (3), pp. 277-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.012spa
dc.relation.referencesGalati, N., Tumialán, G., & Nanni, A. (2006). Strengthening with FRP bars of URM walls subject to out-of-plane loads. Construction and Building Materials, 20(1-2), 101-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.047spa
dc.relation.referencesIngeominas. (1986). El sismo de Popayán de marzo 31 de 1983. Bogotá D.C.: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geológico – Mineras.spa
dc.relation.referencesIngeominas. (1999). Terremoto del Quindío: Enero 25 de 1999. Informe Técnico Preliminar No. 2 Armenia – Quindío. Bogotá D.C.: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geológico – Mineras.spa
dc.relation.referencesKalali, A., & Kabir, M. (2012). Experimental response of double-wythe masonry panels strengthened with glass fiber reinforced polymers subjected to diagonal compression tests. Engineering Structures, 39, 24-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.018spa
dc.relation.referencesKlingner, R. (2006). Behavior of masonry in the Northridge (US) and Tecomán - Colima (Mexico) earthquakes: Lessons learned, and changes in US design. Construction and Building Materials, 20(4), 209-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.024spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez, H. (2012). Comportamiento de muros diafragma en mampostería de concreto reforzados con tejidos de FRP. (M.Sc. thesis, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería). Retrieved from: https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/211spa
dc.relation.referencesLignola, G., Prota, A., Manfredi, G. (2012). Numerical investigation on the influence of FRP retrofit layout and geometry on the in-plane behaviour of masonry walls. Journal of Composites for Construction, 16 (6), pp. 712- 723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000297spa
dc.relation.referencesLuccioni, B., & Rougier, V. (2011). In-plane retrofitting of masonry panels with fiber reinforced composite materials. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1772-1788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.088spa
dc.relation.referencesLunn, D., Maeda, S., Rizkalla, S., & Ueda, T. (2013). Anchorage systems for FRP strengthening of infill masonry structures. International Journal of Sustainable Materials and Structural Systems,1(2), 142-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMSS.2013.056469spa
dc.relation.referencesAIS. (2010). Reglamento colombiano de construcción sismo resistente NSR-10 (Vol. 1 y Vol.2). Bogotá D.C.: Asociación de Ingeniería Sísmica.spa
dc.relation.referencesMosallam, A., & Banerjee, S. (2011). Enhancement in in-plane shear capacity of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 42(6), 1657-1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.03.015spa
dc.relation.referencesPaulay T., & Priestley M.J. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: Wiley.spa
dc.relation.referencesRahman, A., & Ueda, T. (2016). In-plane shear performance of masonry walls after strengthening by two different FRPs. ASCE Journal of Composites for Construction, 20(5),1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943- 5614.0000661spa
dc.relation.referencesSanta María, H., & Alcaino, P. (2011). Repair of in-plane shear damaged masonry walls with external FRP. Construction and Building Materials, 25(3), 1172-1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.030spa
dc.relation.referencesTriantafillou, T., Papanicolaou, C., & Lekka, M. (2011). Externally bonded grids as strengthening and seismic retrofitting materials of masonry panels. Construction and Building Materials, 25(2), 504-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.018spa
dc.relation.referencesTumialan, G., Vatovec, M., & Kelley, P. (2009). FRP Composites for Masonry Retrofitting: Review of Engineering Issues, Limitations and Practical Applications. Structure magazine (May), 12-14. Retrieved from https://www.structuremag.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/C-BuildingBlocks-Tumialan-May091.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesValluzzi, M., Tinazzi, D., & Modena, C. (2002). Shear behavior of masonry panels strengthened by FRP laminates. Construction and Building Materials, 16(7), 409 – 416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00043-0spa
dc.relation.referencesVega, C. (2015). Comportamiento dinámico de muros de mampostería no estructural reforzados mediante polímeros reforzados con fibra de carbono, CFRP. (M.Sc. thesis, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito). Retrieved from https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/211spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)spa
dc.subject.armarcMamposteríaspa
dc.subject.armarcMasonryeng
dc.subject.armarcMurosspa
dc.subject.armarcWallseng
dc.subject.armarcPolímerosspa
dc.subject.armarcPolymerseng
dc.subject.armarcResistencia de materialesspa
dc.subject.armarcStrength of materialseng
dc.subject.proposalUnreinforced masonryeng
dc.subject.proposalFiber reinforced polymerseng
dc.subject.proposalSeismic retrofittingeng
dc.subject.proposalLateral loadseng
dc.subject.proposalMampostería no reforzadaspa
dc.subject.proposalPolímeros reforzados con fibraspa
dc.subject.proposalReforzamiento sísmicospa
dc.subject.proposalCargas lateralesspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/