Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCruz, Antonio Miguel
dc.contributor.authorJuzwishin, Don
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Lili
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T21:03:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T17:16:55Z
dc.date.available2021-05-27
dc.date.available2021-10-01T17:16:55Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1362-3001
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/1509
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to examine the extent to which caregivers can be used to provide proxy responses for dementia clients in a study on the acceptance of GPS technology. Methods: Forty-five client–caregiver dyads used one of three GPS devices. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) was used to create two questionnaires, one for dementia clients and one for caregivers, as proxies. Spearman rho bivariate correlations of responses for each UTAUT construct were used to compare the client and caregiver responses post-usage of the GPS devices. Results: The mean age of the clients was 76.02 years (SD = 11.5). Overall, after using the GPS devices, the responses of the clients and caregivers were correlated and statistically significant (rxy Overall summative scale = 0.550). In addition, 4 out of 6 constructs of the UTAUT were correlated and statistically significant (p < 0.05) (rxy Performance Expectancy = 0.160; rxy Social Influence = 0.478; rxy Behavioural Intention to Use = 0.347; and rxy Actual Use = 0.570). Conclusion: The degree of agreement between the caregivers and clients, especially for the constructs intention to use and actual use of the GPS technology, suggested that caregivers can respond on behalf of dementia clients on technology acceptance questionnaires.eng
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de este estudio fue examinar hasta qué punto se puede utilizar a los cuidadores para que proporcionen respuestas proxy para los clientes con demencia en un estudio sobre la aceptación de la tecnología GPS. Métodos: Cuarenta y cinco díadas cliente-cuidador utilizaron uno de los tres dispositivos GPS. Se utilizó la Teoría Unificada de Aceptación y Uso de la Tecnología (UTAUT) para crear dos cuestionarios, uno para los clientes con demencia y otro para los cuidadores, como sustitutos. Se utilizaron correlaciones bivariadas de Spearman rho de las respuestas para cada constructo de la UTAUT para comparar las respuestas de los clientes y los cuidadores tras el uso de los dispositivos GPS. Resultados: La edad media de los clientes era de 76,02 años (SD = 11,5). En general, tras el uso de los dispositivos GPS, las respuestas de los clientes y los cuidadores estaban correlacionadas y eran estadísticamente significativas (rxy escala sumativa global = 0,550). Además, 4 de los 6 constructos de la UTAUT estaban correlacionados y eran estadísticamente significativos (p < 0,05) (rxy Expectativa de rendimiento = 0,160; rxy Influencia social = 0,478; rxy Intención de comportamiento de uso = 0,347; y rxy Uso real = 0,570). Conclusiones: El grado de acuerdo entre los cuidadores y los clientes, especialmente para los constructos intención de uso y uso real de la tecnología GPS, sugiere que los cuidadores pueden responder en nombre de los clientes con demencia en los cuestionarios de aceptación de la tecnología.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherTaylor y Francis Ltd.eng
dc.sourcehttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1470672spa
dc.titleCaregivers as a proxy for responses of dementia clients in a GPS technology acceptance studyeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGiBiomespa
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0144929X.2018.1470672
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1470672
dc.publisher.placeColombiaspa
dc.relation.citationeditionBehaviour & Information Technology Volume 37, 2018 - Issue 6spa
dc.relation.citationendpage645spa
dc.relation.citationissue6spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage634spa
dc.relation.citationvolume37spa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBehaviour '&' Information Technologyspa
dc.relation.referencesADI (Alzheimer’s disease international). 2014. World Alzheimer Report. Dementia and Risk Reduction an Analysis of Protective and Modifiable Factors.eng
dc.relation.referencesAHS. 2015. Locator Device Project Summary Report. Accessed February 22, 2017. http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/res/if-res-htai-ldp-summary.pdf.eng
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-Teng
dc.relation.referencesAlgase, D., D. Helen Moore, C. Vandeweerd, and D.-J. Gavin-Dreschnack. 2007. “Mapping the Maze of Terms and Definitions in Dementia-Related Wandering.” Aging & Mental Health 11 (6): 686–698. doi: 10.1080/13607860701366434eng
dc.relation.referencesAlwin, D. 2007. Margins of Errors: A Study of Reliability in Survey Measurement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.eng
dc.relation.referencesAnnells, M., M. Brown, and T. Koch. 2001. “Client Relevant Care and Quality of Life: The Trial of a Client Generated Index (CGI) Tool for Community Nursing.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 38: 9–16. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00063-8eng
dc.relation.referencesArmstrong, J. S., and T. S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.” Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402. doi: 10.2307/3150783eng
dc.relation.referencesASC. 2010. Rising Tide: The Impact of Dementia on Canadian Society. Toronto, ON: Alzheimer Society of Canada.eng
dc.relation.referencesBridge, M., D. Roughton, S. Lewis, J. Barelds, S. Brenton, S. Cotter, Mary-Lou Hagebols, Kirsty Woolman, Merilyn Annells, and T. Koch. 2002. “Using Caregivers-as-Proxies to Retrospectively Assess and Measure Quality of Dying of Palliative Care Clients.” American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 19 (3): 193–199. doi: 10.1177/104990910201900311eng
dc.relation.referencesBuckley, T., E. Fauth, A. Morrison, J. Tschanz, P. Rabins, K. Piercy, M. Norton, and C. Lyketsos. 2012. “Predictors of Quality of Life Ratings for Persons with Dementia Simultaneously Reported by Patients and Their Caregivers: The Cache County (Utah) Study.” International Psychogeriatrics 24 (7): 1094–1102. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000063eng
dc.relation.referencesChang, Y. J., Y. Y. Chu, C. N. Chen, and T. Wang. 2008. “Mobile Computing for Indoor Wayfinding Based on Bluetooth Sensors for Individuals with Cognitive Impairments.” 3rd International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing, Santorini: IEEE, 623–627.eng
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y., and C. Leung. 2012. “Exploring Functions of the Lost Seeking Devices for People with Dementia.” Work 41 (Suppl.1): 3093–3100.eng
dc.relation.referencesCompeau, D., and C. Higgins. 1995. “Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills.” Information Systems Research 6 (2): 118–143. doi: 10.1287/isre.6.2.118eng
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–339. doi: 10.2307/249008eng
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F., R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw. 1992. “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (14): 1111–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.xeng
dc.relation.referencesFaucounau, V., G. Orvoen, A. Lacombe, V. Rialle, J. Extra, and A. Rigaud. 2009. “Electronic Tracking System and Wandering in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Case Study.” Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 52 (7-8): 579–587. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2009.07.034eng
dc.relation.referencesFishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesleyeng
dc.relation.referencesGjernes, T., and P. Måseide. 2015. “Dementia, Distributed Interactional Competence and Social Membership.” Journal of Aging Studies 35: 104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.08.002eng
dc.relation.referencesHair, F., M. G. Hult, M. C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2014. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.eng
dc.relation.referencesHernandez-Sampieri, R., C. Fernandez-Collado, and P. Lucio-Baptista. 2006. Metodologia de la Investigacion. Mexico: McGraw Hill.eng
dc.relation.referencesHogan, D. B. 2004. “Home, Safe Home: Minimizing the Risks for the Cognitively Impaired in the Community.” Geriatrics and Aging 7 (8): 48–51.eng
dc.relation.referencesHughes, R. 2008. “Safer Walking? Issues and Ethics in the Use of Electronic Surveillance of People with Dementia.” Journal of Assistive Technologies 2 (1): 45–48. doi: 10.1108/17549450200800007eng
dc.relation.referencesKenny, D. A., and W. Cook. 1999. “Partner Effects in Relationship Research: Conceptual Issues, Analytic Difficulties, and Illustrations.” Personal Relationships 6: 433–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00202.xeng
dc.relation.referencesLandau, R., G. K. Auslander, S. Werner, N. Shoval, and J. Heinik. 2011. “Who Should Make the Decision on the Use of GPS for People with Dementia?” Aging & Mental Health 15: 78–84. doi: 10.1080/13607861003713166eng
dc.relation.referencesLandau, R., and S. Werner. 2012. “Ethical Aspects of Using GPS for Tracking People with Dementia: Recommendations for Practice.” International Psychogeriatrics 24 (3): 358–366. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211001888eng
dc.relation.referencesLaw, M., S. Baptiste, A. Carswell, M. McColl, H. Polatajko, and N. Pollock. 1998. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 3rd ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE.eng
dc.relation.referencesLiu, L., A. Miguel-Cruz, T. Ruptash, S. Barnard, and D. Juzwishin. 2017. “Acceptance of Global Positioning System (GPS) Technology among Dementia Clients and Family Caregivers.” Journal of Technology in Human Services: 1–21. doi:10.1080/15228835.2016.1266724.eng
dc.relation.referencesLord, K., G. Livingston, and C. Cooper. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to and Interventions for Proxy Decision-Making by Family Carers of People with Dementia.” International Psychogeriatrics 27 (8): 1301–1312. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215000411eng
dc.relation.referencesMalle, B. 1999. “How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3 (1): 23–48. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_2eng
dc.relation.referencesMarsden, P., and J. Wright. 2010. Handbook of Survey Research. Bingley: Emerald.eng
dc.relation.referencesMeiland, F., A. Bouman, S. Sävenstedt, S. Bentvelzen, R. Davies, M. Mulvenna, Chris D. Nugent, et al. 2012. “Usability of a New Electronic Assistive Device for Community-Dwelling Persons with Mild Dementia.” Aging and Mental Health 16 (5): 584–591. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.651433eng
dc.relation.referencesMenne, H., S. Tucke, C. Whitlatch, and L. Feinberg. 2008. “Decision-Making Involvement Scale for Individuals with Dementia and Family Caregivers.” American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias 23 (1): 23–29. doi: 10.1177/1533317507308312eng
dc.relation.referencesMoore, G., and I. Benbasat. 1991. “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation.” Information Systems Research 2 (3): 192–222. doi: 10.1287/isre.2.3.192 [eng
dc.relation.referencesPodsakoff, P., S. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879eng
dc.relation.referencesPot, A. M., B. M. Willemse, and S. Horjus. 2012. “A Pilot Study on the Use of Tracking Technology: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Benefits for People in Early Stages of Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers.” Aging & Mental Health 16 (1): 127–134. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.596810eng
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, L., K. Brittain, S. Lindsay, D. Jackson, and P. Olivier. 2009. “Keeping in Touch Everyday (KITE) Project: Developing Assistive Technologies with People with Dementia and their Carers to Promote Independence.” International Psychogeriatrics 21 (3): 494–502. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209008448eng
dc.relation.referencesSauro, J. 2011. How to Find the Right Sample Size for A Usability Test. December 7, 2011.eng
dc.relation.referencesSpector, A., and M. Orrell. 2006. “Quality of Life (QoL) in Dementia: A Comparison of the Perceptions of People with Dementia and Care Staff in Residential Homes.” Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 20 (3): 160–165. doi: 10.1097/00002093-200607000-00007eng
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, S., and P. Todd. 1995. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models.” Information Systems Research 6 (2): 144–176. doi: 10.1287/isre.6.2.144eng
dc.relation.referencesUniversity of Alberta. 2015. Usability of Locator Technology among Home Care Clients at Risk for Wandering: Evaluation Report. Edmonton: University of Albertaeng
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” Mis Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.subject.armarcTecnología médica
dc.subject.armarcEnfermedad de Alzheimer
dc.subject.proposalTechnology acceptancespa
dc.subject.proposalUTAUT modelspa
dc.subject.proposalGlobal positioning systemspa
dc.subject.proposalDementiaspa
dc.subject.proposalAlzheimer’s diseasespa
dc.subject.proposalAceptación de la tecnologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalModelo UTAUTspa
dc.subject.proposalSistema de posicionamiento globalspa
dc.subject.proposalDemenciaspa
dc.subject.proposalEnfermedad de Alzheimerspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • AA. Gibiome [38]
    Clasificación: A - Convocatoria 2018

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem