Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorQuiroga Torres, Daniel Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorPresiga, Ana Maria
dc.contributor.authorFlórez Luna, Nestor
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Antonio Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T17:44:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T17:16:55Z
dc.date.available2021-06-15T17:44:41Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T17:16:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/1576
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to measure what the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements are after finishing medical devices courses I and II. This is a pre- post-test with no control group study design. Twenty-four students doing medical devices courses I and II with a test in the simulation center of a Biomedical Engineering Program participated in this pilot study. A paper-based survey composed of a demographic and 5-point Likert (“1” is strongly disagree and “5” is strongly agree) measured the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after exposing them to medical devices courses. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U Test statistics were conducted to test the two hypotheses of this study. Our analysis showed statistically significant results between the pre-survey sum mean and SD: 7.50, 1.31; and between the post-survey mean and SD: 8.56, 1.15, p=0.015, indicating the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after putting them through medical devices courses I and II had significantly improved by the end of the courses. Also, no statistically significant results were found between the post-survey mean and SD: 4.37, 0.57 learning outcome perceptions or between the students’ actual marks mean and SD: 4.58, 0.18, p=0.28), indicating no differences between what the students perceived they had learned compared with what they had really learned.eng
dc.description.abstractEste artículo tiene como objetivo medir cuáles son los logros de los resultados de aprendizaje percibidos por los estudiantes después de terminar los cursos de dispositivos médicos I y II. Esta es una prueba previa y posterior sin un diseño de estudio de grupo de control. En este estudio piloto participaron veinticuatro estudiantes de los cursos I y II de dispositivos médicos con una prueba en el centro de simulación de un Programa de Ingeniería Biomédica. Una encuesta en papel compuesta por datos demográficos y Likert de 5 puntos (“1” está totalmente en desacuerdo y “5” está totalmente de acuerdo) midió los logros de los resultados de aprendizaje percibidos por los estudiantes después de exponerlos a cursos de dispositivos médicos. Se realizaron una prueba de rango con signo de Wilcoxon y una prueba estadística de la prueba U de Mann-Whitney para probar las dos hipótesis de este estudio. Nuestro análisis mostró resultados estadísticamente significativos entre la media de la suma previa a la encuesta y la DE: 7,50, 1,31; y entre la media posterior a la encuesta y la DE: 8,56, 1,15, p = 0,015, lo que indica que los logros de los resultados de aprendizaje percibidos por los estudiantes después de someterlos a los cursos de dispositivos médicos I y II habían mejorado significativamente al final de los cursos. Además, no se encontraron resultados estadísticamente significativos entre la media posterior a la encuesta y la DE: 4,37, 0,57 percepciones de los resultados de aprendizaje o entre la media de las calificaciones reales de los estudiantes y la DE: 4,58, 0,18, p = 0,28), lo que indica que no hay diferencias entre lo que los estudiantes percibieron que habían aprendido en comparación con lo que realmente habían aprendido.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherSpringer Verlageng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolumen 60;
dc.sourcehttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-981-10-4086-3_8spa
dc.titleTeaching maintenance of medical devices in simulation centers: a pilot studyeng
dc.typeCapítulo - Parte de Librospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGiBiomespa
dc.identifier.ark1680-0737
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_8
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_8
dc.publisher.placeAlemaniaspa
dc.relation.citationendpage33spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage30spa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.ispartofbookIfmbe Proceedingsspa
dc.relation.referencesACCE, “American College of Clinical Engineering,” 1992. [Online]. Available: http://accenet.org/about/Documents/What’s_a_Clinical_Engineer.pdf.eng
dc.relation.referencesJ. Nagel, “Protocol for the training of clinical engineers in Europe,” BIOMEDEA PROJECT, Stuttgart, 2005.eng
dc.relation.referencesHTF, “2013 Candidate Handbook for Certification in Clinical Engineering by the Healthcare Technology Certification Commission,” Healthcare Technology Certification Commission, Plymouth, 2013.eng
dc.relation.referencesG. H. Buck, “Development of simulators in medical education,” Gesnerus : Swiss Journal of the history of medicine and sciences, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 7-28, 1991.eng
dc.relation.referencesM. Koretsky, C. Kelly and E. Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 540 - 573, 2011.eng
dc.relation.referencesG. Alinier, B. Hunt, R. Gordon and C. Harwood, “Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 359-369, 2006.eng
dc.relation.referencesI. Gieras, P. Sherman and D. Minsent, “Patient Safety Trilogy: Perspectives from Clinical Engineering,” Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 137-142, 2013.eng
dc.relation.referencesD. E. a. H. B. A. Ziv, “38 - Clinical Simulation on a National Level: Israel,” in Clinical Simulation, Oxford, Academic Press, 2008, pp. 371-375.eng
dc.relation.referencesR. J. Glavin, “37 - A National Simulation Center Influences Teaching at a National Level: Scotland,” in Clinical Simulation, Oxford, Academic Press, 2008, pp. 365-370.eng
dc.relation.referencesS. Mönk, J. Vollmer and W. Heinrichs, “34 - A National Simulation Program: Germany,” in Clinical Simulation, Oxford, Academic Press, 2008, pp. 345-353.eng
dc.relation.referencesA. Miguel-Cruz, A. Rios-Rincon, W. Rodríguez-Dueñas, N. Florez-Luna and D. Quiroga-Torres, “What is the effect of an introductory biomedical engineering course on the students’ perceptions of the engineering profession?,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, p. 136–149, 1(A) 2016.eng
dc.relation.referencesJ. Biggs, Teaching for Quality Learning At University, Berkshire: England: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 2003, p. 54.eng
dc.relation.referencesI. Motola, L. A. Devine, H. Soo Chung, J. E. Sullivan and B. Issenberg, “Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82,” Medical Teacher, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. e1511-e1530, 2013.eng
dc.relation.referencesL. Portney and M. Watkins, Foundations of Clinical Research:Applications to Practice, New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008, pp. 421-422.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.subject.armarcEducación médica
dc.subject.armarcAprendizaje previo - Evaluaciónspa
dc.subject.armarcPrior learning - Evaluationeng
dc.subject.proposalBiomedical engineeringeng
dc.subject.proposalEngineering educationeng
dc.subject.proposalMedical deviceseng
dc.subject.proposalSimulation centereng
dc.subject.proposalIngeniería Biomédicaspa
dc.subject.proposalEducación en ingenieríaspa
dc.subject.proposalDispositivos médicosspa
dc.subject.proposalCentro de simulaciónspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/LIBspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • AA. Gibiome [38]
    Clasificación: A - Convocatoria 2018

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem