Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorOrtega Hortelano, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorVassallo Magro, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGuzman Valderrama, Andres Felipe
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Martínez, P.J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-17T21:16:40Z
dc.date.available2014
dc.date.available2022-05-17T21:16:40Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn01441647spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/2062
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we carry out a thorough review of the current research related to the benefits and costs arising from the implementation of longer and heavier vehicles (LHVs). From this review we concluded that despite the many studies available, little has been said about the sensitivity of the benefits and costs to the ultimate performance of the key variables related to the evolution of the economy, road transport performance, safety, and so on. In order to fill this gap, we have designed a sensitivity approach based on a cost benefit analysis tool to determine which variables demonstrate the greatest influence on the benefits and costs stemming from the implementation of LHVs. In order to test the methodology, we have used it in an analysis of the Spanish trunk network. The results show that the benefits of LHVs for society are significant. Even in the least favorable scenario, the economic benefits are greater than €3500 million over 15 years, and the environment enhanced as well, for CO2 emissions are reduced by 2 Million tonnes. Overall we noted how the results are not very sensitive to the evolution of key variables in determining the final outcome. However, we found that the variables that have the greatest affect on the final benefit, such as traffic growth and social discount rate, depend basically on the performance of the overall economy. Moreover, the private cost for haulers seems to be more important in determining the final benefit than externality costs.eng
dc.description.abstractEn este artículo llevamos a cabo una revisión exhaustiva de la investigación actual relacionada con los beneficios y costos derivados de la implementación de vehículos más largos y pesados ​​(LHV). De esta revisión concluimos que, a pesar de los muchos estudios disponibles, se ha dicho poco sobre la sensibilidad de los beneficios y costos al desempeño final de las variables clave relacionadas con la evolución de la economía, el desempeño del transporte por carretera, la seguridad, etc. Para llenar este vacío, hemos diseñado un enfoque de sensibilidad basado en una herramienta de análisis de costo-beneficio para determinar qué variables demuestran una mayor influencia en los beneficios y costos derivados de la implementación de LHV. Para probar la metodología, la hemos utilizado en un análisis de la red troncal española. Los resultados muestran que los beneficios de los LHV para la sociedad son significativos. Incluso en el escenario menos favorable, los beneficios económicos superan los 3500 millones de euros en 15 años, y también se mejora el medio ambiente, ya que las emisiones de CO2 se reducen en 2 millones de toneladas. En general, notamos cómo los resultados son poco sensibles a la evolución de las variables clave para determinar el resultado final. Sin embargo, encontramos que las variables que más afectan el beneficio final, como el crecimiento del tráfico y la tasa de descuento social, dependen básicamente del desempeño de la economía en general. Además, el costo privado para los transportistas parece ser más importante para determinar el beneficio final que los costos de las externalidades.spa
dc.format.extent18 páginas.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Politécnica de Madridspa
dc.sourcehttps://oa.upm.es/35643/spa
dc.titleAre Longer and Heavier Vehicles (LHVs) Beneficial for Society? A Cost Benefit Analysis to Evaluate their Potential Implementation in Spaineng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Vías y Transportespa
dc.contributor.researchgroupCentro de Investigación del Transporte (TRANSyT) (UPM)spa
dc.publisher.placeMadrid, España.spa
dc.relation.citationendpage168spa
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage150spa
dc.relation.citationvolume34spa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalTransport Reviewseng
dc.relation.referencesAparicio, A. (2012, June). Movilidad 2030: Perspectivas a largo plazo de la movilidad interurbana de viajeros en Espan˜a. Paper presented at the X Congreso de Ingenierı´a del transporte, Granada.spa
dc.relation.referencesBackman, H., & Nordstro¨m, R. (2002). Improved performance of European long haulage transport (Report 2002: 6E). Sweden: Transport Research Institute TFK. Retrieved from http://www.modularsystem. eu/download/facts_and_figures/final_report_extra.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesBereni, M., & Jacob, E. (2009, January). A look into the likely consequences of adapting weights and dimensions of heavy commercial vehicles in Europe. Paper presented at Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Washington.spa
dc.relation.referencesBergqvist, R., & Behrends, S. (2011). Assessing the effects of longer vehicles: The case of pre- and posthaulage in intermodal transport chains. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 31(5), 591–602. doi:10.1080/01441647.2011.584980spa
dc.relation.referencesBryan, J. G., Weisbrod, G., & Martland, C. D. (2007). Rail freight as a means of reducing roadway congestion: Feasibility considerations for transportation planning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008, 75–83. doi:10.3141/2008-10spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, H. F., & Brown, R. P. (2005). A multiple account framework for cost–benefit analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(1), 23–32. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan. 2004.05.001spa
dc.relation.referencesChristidis, P., & Leduc, G. (2009). Longer and heavier vehicles for freight transport (Report). Sevilla: European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.spa
dc.relation.referencesClayton, A., Montufar, J., & Middleton, D. (2003). Operation of long semitrailers in the United States. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1833, 79–86. doi:10.3141/ 1833-11spa
dc.relation.referencesCommission for Integrated Transport. (2000). Interim report: Permitting 44 tonne lorries for general use in the UK. London: Commission for Integrated Transport. Retrieved from http://webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110304132839/http://cfit.independent.gov.uk/pubs/2000/44tonne/ 44tonne/pdf/44tonne.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDebauche, W., & Decock, D. (2007, September). Longer and heavier goods vehicles (LHVS): A multidisciplinary approach to the issue in Belgium. Paper presented at Choice for Sustainable Development. Pre-Proceedings of the 23rd PIARRC World Road Congress, Paris.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Palma, A., Picard, N., & Andrieu, L. (2012). Risk in transport investments. Networks and Spatial Economics, 12(2), 187–204. doi:10.1007/s11067-009-9109-8spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Environment Agency. (2009). Transport at a crossroads. TERM 2008: Indicators tracking transport and environment in the European Union (Report no. 3/2009). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, EEA. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/transport-at-a-crossroadsspa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, D. J., & Sezer, H. (2005). Social discount rates for member countries of the European Union. Journal of Economic Studies, 32, 47–59. doi:10.1108/01443580510574832spa
dc.relation.referencesFortowsky, J. K., & Humphreys, J. (2006). Estimating traffic changes and pavement impacts from freight truck diversion following changes in interstate truck weight limits. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1966, 71–79. doi:10.3141/1966-09spa
dc.relation.referencesGhosn, M., & Moses, F. (2000). Effect of changing truck weight regulations on U.S. bridge network: Part II. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 5(4), 304–310. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(304)spa
dc.relation.referencesGlaeser, K., Kaschner, M., Lerner, G., Roder, C., Weber, R., Wolf, A., & Zander, U. (2006). Effects of new vehicle concepts on the infrastructure of the federal truck road network (Final Report). Federal Republic of Germany: Federal Highway Research Institute, Bast.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlaeser, K., & Ritzinger, A. (2012). Comparison of the performance of heavy vehicles results of the OECD study: “Moving freight with better trucks”. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 106–120. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.992spa
dc.relation.referencesGregory, A. W., & Reeves, J. J. (2008). Interpreting value at risk (VaR) forecasts. Economic Systems, 32(2), 167–176. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2007.03.001spa
dc.relation.referencesGrislis, A. (2010). Longer combination vehicles and road safety. Transport, 25(3), 336–343. doi:10.3846/ transport.2010.41spa
dc.relation.referencesHanley, P. F., & Forkenbrock, D. J. (2005). Safety of passing longer combination vehicles on two-lane highways. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.001spa
dc.relation.referencesHewitt, J., Stephens, J., Smith, K., & Menuez, N. (1999). Infrastructure and economic impacts of changes in truck weight regulations in Montana. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1653, 42–51. doi:10.3141/1653-06spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Union of Railways Communications Department. (2007). Mega-trucks versus rail freight? What the admission of mega-trucks would really mean for Europe Facts and arguments. Paris: UIC. Retrieved from http://www.uic.org/etf/publication/publication-detail.php?code_pub¼511_02spa
dc.relation.referencesKnight, I., Newton, W., McKinnon, A., Palmer, A., Barlow, T., McCrae, I., ... Taylor, N. (2008). Longer and/or longer and heavier goods vehicles (LHVs)—a study of the likely effects if permitted in the UK: Final Report (Final Report). UK: TRL study for the UK DfT. Retrieved from http://www.trl.co.uk/ online_store/reports_publications/trl_reports/cat_vehicle_engineering/report_Longer_and/or_ Longer_and_Heavier_Goods_Vehicles_LHVs___a_Study_of_the_Effects_if_Permitted_in_the_UK_ Final_Report.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesK+P. (2011). Study on the effects of the introduction of LHVs on combined road–rail transport and single wagonload rail freight traffic (Report of October 2011 in cooperation with Fraunhofer ISI). Retrieved from http:// www.cer.be/publications/studies/studies-details/study-on-the-effects-of-the-introduction-of-lhvs-oncombined-road-rail-transport-and-single-wagonload-rail-freight-traffic/spa
dc.relation.referencesMcKinnon, A. C. (2005). The economic and environmental benefits of increasing maximum truck weight: The British experience. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(1), 77– 95. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2004.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesMcKinnon, A. C. (2008). Should the maximum length and weight of trucks be increased? A review of european evidence. Presented at International Symposium on Logistics, Bangkok.spa
dc.relation.referencesOficemen. (2009, September). Estudio sobre la viabilidad de la mejora del transporte de mercancı´as mediante el uso de vehı´culos de gran capacidad (Mega-trucks) y la necesidad de adecuacio´n de infraestructuras. Presented at Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Madrid.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtega, A., & Vassallo, J. M. (2012, June). El Megatruck en Espan˜a: ¿Camino hacia una mejora energe´tica y medioambiental?. Paper presented at the X Congreso de Ingenierı´a del transporte, Granada.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtega, A., Vassallo, J. M., & Perez, P. J. (2011). Efecto de la implantacio´n del vehı´culo de 25,25 y 60 Ton. en Espan˜a. Balance del incremento de las dimensiones y capacidad de carga ma´ximas de los vehı´culos pesados de transporte por carretera. Madrid: Fundacio´n Corell. Retrieved from http://www.fundacion-fcorell.es/ index.php?option¼com_booklibrary&task¼view&id¼40&catid¼0&Itemid¼63spa
dc.relation.referencesPe´rez, P. J., & Monzo´n, A. (2010, July). La eficiencia energe´tica y ambiental de los modos de transporte en Espan˜a. Paper presented at XVI Congreso Panamericano de Ingenierı´a de Tra´nsito y Transporte y Logı´stica, Lisbon. Retrieved from http://oa.upm.es/7420/spa
dc.relation.referencesRegehr, J. D., Montufar, J., & Clayton, A. (2009). Lessons learned about the impacts of size and weight regulations on the articulated truck fleet in the Canadian prairie region. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36(4), 607–616. doi:10.1139/L09-011spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, F. L., & Djakfar, L. (2000). Cost of pavement damage due to heavier loads on Louisiana highways: Preliminary assessment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1732, 3–11. doi:10.3141/1732-01spa
dc.relation.referencesRufolo, A. M., Bronfman, L., & Kuhner, E. (2000). Effect of Oregon’s axle-weight-distance tax incentive. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1732, 63–69. doi:10.3141/ 1732-08spa
dc.relation.referencesStephens, J., Scoles, J., Patterson, S., & Schillings, P. (1997). Impact on Montana’s highways of adopting CANADIAN interprovincial and canamex limits on vehicle size and weight. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1602, 31–38. doi:10.3141/1602-05spa
dc.relation.referencesTapiero, C. S. (2005). Production, manufacturing and logistics value at risk and inventory control. European Journal of Operational Research, 163(3), 769–775. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor. 2003.05.005spa
dc.relation.referencesVassallo, J. M., Lo´pez, E., & Pe´rez-Martı´nez, P. J. (2012). Do charges to freight trucks and trains in the European Union reflect their social marginal cost? Application to the case of Spain. Road & Transport Research, 21, 13–24. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn¼2085484565 26784;res¼IELENGspa
dc.relation.referencesVierth, I., Berell, H., McDaniel, J., Haraldsson, M., Hammarstro¨m, U., Mohammad-Reza, Y., ... Bjo¨rketun, U. (2008). The effects of long and heavy trucks on the transport system. Stockholm: VTI. Retrieved from http://www.vti.se/en/publications/the-effects-of-long-and-heavy-trucks-on-the-transportsystem-report-on-a-government-assignment/spa
dc.relation.referencesVierth, I., & Haraldsson. M. (2012, September). Socio-economic effects of longer and/or heavier road transport vehicles—the Swedish case. Presented at International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Transport Technology, Stockholm.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.subject.armarcControl de costosspa
dc.subject.armarcCost controleng
dc.subject.armarcVehículos - Control de costosspa
dc.subject.armarcVehicles - cost controleng
dc.subject.armarcAnálisis de costosspa
dc.subject.armarcCost effectivenesseng
dc.subject.armarcTransportation - Cost Analysiseng
dc.subject.armarcTransporte - Análisis de costosspa
dc.subject.proposalcost benefit analysiseng
dc.subject.proposalensitivity analysiseng
dc.subject.proposallonger and heavier vehicles (LHVs)eng
dc.subject.proposalSpaineng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem