Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCadavid, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorAndrikopoulos, Vasilios
dc.contributor.authorAvgeriou, Paris
dc.contributor.authorBroekema, Chris
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-08T20:31:01Z
dc.date.available2024-07-08T20:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0950-5849spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/3150
dc.description.abstractThe problems caused by the gap between systemand software-level architecting practices, especially in the context of Systems of Systems where the two disciplines inexorably meet, is a well known issue with a disappointingly low amount of works in the literature dedicated to it. At the same time, organizations working on Systems of Systems have been developing solutions for closing this gap for many years now. This work aims to extract such knowledge from practitioners by studying the case of a large-scale scientific instrument, a geographically distributed radio telescope to be more specific, developed as a sequence of projects during the last two decades. As the means for collecting data for this study we combine online interviews with a virtual focus group of practitioners from the organization responsible for building the instrument. Through this process, we identify persisting problems and the best practices that have been developed to deal with them, together with the perceived benefits and drawbacks of applying the latter in practice. Some of our major findings include the need to avoid over-reliance on the flexibility of software to compensate for incomplete requirements, hidden assumptions, as well as late involvement of system architecting, and to facilitate the cooperation between the involved disciplines through dedicated architecting roles and the adoption of unifying practices and standards.eng
dc.description.abstractLos problemas causados ​​por la brecha entre las prácticas de arquitectura a nivel de sistemas y software, especialmente en el contexto de Sistemas de Sistemas donde las dos disciplinas se encuentran inexorablemente, es un problema bien conocido con una cantidad decepcionantemente baja de trabajos en la literatura dedicados a ello. Al mismo tiempo, las organizaciones que trabajan en Sistemas de Sistemas llevan muchos años desarrollando soluciones para cerrar esta brecha. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo extraer ese conocimiento de los profesionales mediante el estudio del caso de un instrumento científico a gran escala, un radiotelescopio distribuido geográficamente para ser más específicos, desarrollado como una secuencia de proyectos durante las últimas dos décadas. Como medio para recopilar datos para este estudio, combinamos entrevistas en línea con un grupo focal virtual de profesionales de la organización responsable de construir el instrumento. A través de este proceso, identificamos los problemas persistentes y las mejores prácticas que se han desarrollado para abordarlos, junto con los beneficios y desventajas percibidos de aplicar estas últimas en la práctica. Algunos de nuestros principales hallazgos incluyen la necesidad de evitar una dependencia excesiva de la flexibilidad del software para compensar requisitos incompletos, suposiciones ocultas, así como la participación tardía de la arquitectura de sistemas, y facilitar la cooperación entre las disciplinas involucradas a través de roles de arquitectura dedicados y la adopción de prácticas y normas unificadoras.spa
dc.format.extent12 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherElsevier Sciencespa
dc.sourcehttps://www.icsa.org/publications/spa
dc.titleSystem- and Software-level Architecting Harmonization Practices for Systems-of-Systems: An exploratory case study on a long-running large-scale scientific instrumenteng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupCTG - Informáticaspa
dc.identifier.eissn0950-5849spa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavitospa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Digitalspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.placePaíses Bajosspa
dc.relation.citationeditionNo. 150 Año 2022spa
dc.relation.citationissue150spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInformation and software technologyeng
dc.relation.referencesDraft bs iso/iec 21839 information technology- systems and software engineering- system of systems (sos) considerations in life cycle stages of a system. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, March 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesArt Pyster, Rick Adcock, Mark Ardis, Rob Cloutier, Devanandham Henry, Linda Laird, and J Wade. Exploring the relationship between systems engineering and software engineering. Procedia Computer Science, 44(2015a):708–717, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesGerrit Muller. Validation of systems engineering methods and techniques in industry. Procedia Computer Science, 8:321–326, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesSarah Sheard, Michael E Pafford, and Mike Phillips. Systems engineering–software engineering interface for cyber-physical systems. In INCOSE International Symposium, volume 29, pages 249–268. Wiley Online Library, 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichard E Fairley. Systems Engineering of Softwareenabled Systems. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesMark W Maier. System and software architecture reconciliation. Systems Engineering, 9(2):146–159, 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesJames A Crowder, John N Carbone, and Russell Demijohn. Multidisciplinary systems engineering: Architecting the design process. Springer, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesMichael Gagliardi, WG Wood, J Klein, and J Morley. A uniform approach for system of systems architecture evaluation. CrossTalk, 22(3-4):12–15, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarry W Boehm. Extending software engineering research outside the digital box. In Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research, pages 39–42. ACM, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesH´ ector Cadavid, Vasilios Andrikopoulos, Paris Avgeriou, and John Klein. A survey on the interplay between software engineering and systems engineering during sos architecting. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), pages 1–11, 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesSally Muscarella, Macaulay Osaisai, and Sarah Sheard. Systems and software interface survey. In INCOSE International Symposium, volume 30, pages 1294–1312. Wiley Online Library, 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesIso/iec 15288 systems and software engineering- system life cycle processes (also: Ieee std 15288-2008). Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, March 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaghu Singh. International standard iso/iec 12207 software life cycle processes. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 2(1):35–50, 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesOffice of the Under Secretary of Defense- AT&L. Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems, 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesDanse: Designing for adaptability and evolution in system-of-systems engineering., 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesCompass: Comprehensive modelling for advanced systems of systems., 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmadeos: Architecture for multi-criticality agile dependable evolutionary open system-of-systems, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. P. van Haarlem, M. W. Wise, A. W. Gunst, et al. LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 556, August 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarry Boehm and Jo Ann Lane. Using the incremental commitment model to integrate system acquisition, systems engineering, and software engineering. CrossTalk, 19(10):4–9, 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesMark W Maier. The art of systems architecting. CRC press, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesArt Pyster, David H Olwell, Nicole Hutchison, Stephanie Enck, James F Anthony Jr, Devanandham Henry, et al. Guide to the systems engineering body of knowledge (sebok) v. 1.0. 1. Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesMark W Maier. Architecting principles for systemsof-systems. Systems Engineering: The Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering, 1(4):267284, 1998.spa
dc.relation.referencesDonald Firesmith. Profiling systems using the defining characteristics of systems of systems (sos). 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesJason Hessels. KNAW-Agenda Grootschalige Onderzoeksfaciliteiten, 2016 (accessed December 6, 2019).spa
dc.relation.referencesVictor R Basili. Software modeling and measurement: the goal/question/metric paradigm. Technical report, 1992.spa
dc.relation.referencesPer Runeson and Martin H¨ ost. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical software engineering, 14(2):131, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesJanice E Hawkins. The practical utility and suitability of email interviews in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 23(2), 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesMichael H Miner, Walter O Bockting, Rebecca Swinburne Romine, and Sivakumaran Raman. Conducting internet research with the transgender population: Reaching broad samples and collecting valid data. Social science computer review, 30(2):202–211, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesAiril Haimi Mohd Adnan and Zarlina Mohd Zamari. Computer-aided self-access language learning: Views of indonesian, malaysian & new zealand practitioners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67:49–60, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesChandra Bowden and Sebastian Galindo-Gonzalez. Interviewing when you’re not face-to-face: The use of email interviews in a phenomenological study. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10(12):79–92, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Crosby and A.-J. Boonstra. Lofar project- post project and lessons learned review (internal report). ASTRON, 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesJyrki Kontio, Johanna Bragge, and Laura Lehtola. The focus group method as an empirical tool in software engineering. In Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, pages 93–116. Springer, 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesKate Stewart and Matthew Williams. Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5(4):395–416, 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeter J Murray. Using virtual focus groups in qualitative research. Qualitative health research, 7(4):542–549, 1997.spa
dc.relation.referencesMargaret F Moloney, Alexa S Dietrich, Ora Strickland, and Stuart Myerburg. Using intern as virtual focus groups. Advances in Nursing Science, 26(4):274–286, 2003.et discussion boardsspa
dc.relation.referencesSatu Elo and Helvi Kyng¨as. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1):107115, 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristine Hofmeister, Philippe Kruchten, Robert L Nord, Henk Obbink, Alexander Ran, and Pierre America. Generalizing a model of software architecture design from f ive industrial approaches. In 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA’05), pages 77–88. IEEE, 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesAntony Tang, Paris Avgeriou, Anton Jansen, Rafael Capilla, and Muhammad Ali Babar. A comparative study of architecture knowledge management tools. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(3):352–370, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesStefan Thomke and Takahiro Fujimoto. The effect of “front-loading” problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 17(2):128–142, 2000.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaap D. Bregman. Design concepts for a sky noise limited low frequency array. In A.B. Smolders and M.P. van Haarlem, editors, Perspectives on Radio AstronomyTechnologies for Large Antenna Arrays, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaap D. Bregman. Concept design for a low-frequency array. In Proc.SPIE, volume 4015, pages 4015– 401514, 2000.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaap D. Bregman. System Optimisation Of Multi-Beam Aperture Synthesis Arrays For Survey Performance. Experimental Astronomy, 17:365–380, June 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoger Champagne and Hassna Louadah. Will the ICDs Please Stand Up? An Attempt to Reason about Subsystem Interfaces in Avionics System Integration. In 2016 Architecture-Centric Virtual Integration (ACVI), pages 19–24, April 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Blyler. Interface management. IEEE Instrumentation Measurement Magazine, 7(1):32–37, March 2004. Conference Name: IEEE Instrumentation Measurement Magazine.spa
dc.relation.referencesLouis S Wheatcraft. 9.2. 2 everything you wanted to know about interfaces, but were afraid to ask. In INCOSE International Symposium, volume 20, pages 1132–1149.spa
dc.relation.referencesSebastian Haag and Reiner Anderl. Automated generation of as-manufactured geometric representations for digital twins using step. Procedia CIRP, 84:1082–1087,spa
dc.relation.referencesClaudio Tanci, Gino Tosti, Elisa Antolini, Giorgio Francesco Gambini, Pietro Bruno, Rodolfo Canestrari, Vito Conforti, Saverio Lombardi, Federico Russo, Pierluca Sangiorgi, et al. Software design and code generation for the engineering graphical user interface of the astri sst-2m prototype for the cherenkov telescope array. In Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV, volume 9913, page 99133X. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesJulio Garrido Campos, Juan S´ aez L´ opez, Jos´ e Ignacio Armesto Quiroga, and Angel Manuel Espada Seoane. Automatic generation of digital twin industrial system from a high level specification. Procedia Manufacturing, 38:1095–1102, 2019spa
dc.relation.referencesEP Hinchy, Noel P O’Dowd, and Conor T McCarthy. Using open-source microcontrollers to enable digital twin communication for smart manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 38:1213–1219, 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesH´ ector Cadavid, Vasilios Andrikopoulos, and Paris Avgeriou. Architecting systems of systems: A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesFatmah Yousef Assiri and Rashid Mehmood. Software quality in the era of big data, iot and smart cities. In Smart Infrastructure and Applications, pages 519–536. Springer, 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesKartik Krishna Bhardwaj, Anirudh Khanna, Deepak Kumar Sharma, and Anshuman Chhabra. Designing energyefficient iot-based intelligent transport system: Need, architecture, characteristics, challenges, and applications. In Energy Conservation for IoT Devices, pages 209–233. Springer, 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesHassna Louadah, Roger Champagne, Yvan Labiche, and Yann-Ga¨ el Gu´ eh´ eneuc. A Data Extraction Process for Avionics Systems’ Interface Specifications. pages 544554, August 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesSirous F Yasseri and Hamid Bahai. Interface and integration management for fpsos. Ocean Engineering, 191:106441, 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesRashidah Kasauli, Eric Knauss, Joyce NakatumbaNabende, and Benjamin Kanagwa. Agile islands in a waterfall environment: Challenges and strategies in automotive. In Proceedings of the Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pages 31–40. 2020.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.subject.armarcArquitectura de software - Casos de estudio
dc.subject.armarcSoftware architecture - Case study
dc.subject.armarcIngeniería de sistemas de sistemas - Estudio de casos
dc.subject.armarcSystems of Systems Engineering - Case Study
dc.subject.armarcSoftware - Estudio de casos
dc.subject.armarcSoftware - Case study
dc.subject.proposalSystems of systemseng
dc.subject.proposalSistemas de sistemasspa
dc.subject.proposalArchitectingeng
dc.subject.proposalCase studyeng
dc.subject.proposalArquitecturaspa
dc.subject.proposalEstudio de casosspa
dc.subject.proposalScientific instrumentseng
dc.subject.proposalInstrumentos científicosspa
dc.subject.proposalEmpirical software engineeringeng
dc.subject.proposalIngeniería de software empíricaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem