Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSarmiento Palacio, Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T22:51:05Z
dc.date.available2023-07-26T22:51:05Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0121-5132spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/2515
dc.description.abstractEn la teoría del crecimiento se incurrió en dos graves errores. Primero, la fase de transición es un proceso corto. Segundo, el crecimiento tiende a ser determinado o dominado por la tecnología. De esta manera, el margen de maniobra sobre el crecimiento es casi inexistente. Todo lo que hay que hacer es esperar a que la tecnología venga de afuera y eleve los niveles de educación de la población. A la larga, la economía tiende a un equilibrio estacionario en que el capital, los ingresos laborales y el producto nacional evolucionan al mismo ritmo. Lo más grave es que ese perfil es neutral en materia de crecimiento y no requiere mayor presencia del Estado para hacerlo equitativo, porque ambas propiedades tienden a darse en forma exógena.spa
dc.description.abstractIn the theory of growth, two serious mistakes. First, the transition phase is a short process. Second, growth tends to be determined or dominated by technology. In this way, the margin maneuver on growth is almost non-existent. All you have to do is wait for the technology come from outside and raise the education levels of the population. In the long run, the economy tends to balance stationary in which capital, labor income, and national product evolve at the same rate. Hills serious is that this profile is neutral in terms of growth and does not require a greater presence of the State to make it equitable, because both properties tend to occur exogenously.eng
dc.format.extent19 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavitospa
dc.sourcehttps://escuelaing.s3.amazonaws.com/production/documents/Revista_Escuela_Colombiana_de_Ingenier%C3%ADa_99.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAWFY3NGTFD5OU3IGB&Signature=a2xg6MvOiMVYD93U0fTPulQD%2BD0%3D&Expires=1692826720spa
dc.titleCrecimiento desbalanceado y política industrialspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupCentro de Estudios Económicosspa
dc.identifier.eissn0121-5132spa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio digitalspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá D.C.spa
dc.relation.citationeditionNo. 99 Julio - Septiembre de 2015spa
dc.relation.citationendpage28spa
dc.relation.citationissue99spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage7spa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista de la Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieríaeng
dc.relation.referencesBarro, R. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesBernanke, B.S, & Gürkaynak, R.S. (2001). Is growth exogenous? Tanking Mankiw, Romer and Weil seriously. INNBR Macroeconomics Annual, 16.spa
dc.relation.referencesDomar, E. (1976). Capital expansion, rate of growth, and employment. Econometrical, 14 (abril).spa
dc.relation.referencesFama, E & French, K. (1992). The cross section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarrod, R.F. (1942). Toward a dynamic economics: some recent development of economic theory and their application to policy, London: Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesHelpman, E. (2004). The mistery of economics growth. Harvard University Press. Cambridge (Massachusetts), and London (England).spa
dc.relation.referencesKaldor, N. (1963). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In Friedrich A. Lutz and Douglas C. Hague (eds.). Proceeding of a conference held by the International Economics Association. London: Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlenow, P. & Rodríguez, A. (1997). The neoclassical revival in growth economics: has it gone too far? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12.spa
dc.relation.referencesKoopmans, T.C. (1965). On the concept of optimal economic growth. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, 163. Recuperado de http://cowles.econ.yaleedu/P/cd/d01b/d0163.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuznets, S. (1955). Economics growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoaiza, Fajnzilber & Calderón (2004). Crecimiento económico en América Latina y el Caribe. Cepal.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucas, R. (1998). The mechanics of economic development. Journal Monetary Economic, 22.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucas, R. (2002). Lectures on economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMankiw, N.G., Romer, D. & Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437.spa
dc.relation.referencesPasinetty, L.L. (1977). Lectures on the theory of production. London: Macmillan; New York: Columbia University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, J. (1953). The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economics Studies, 21 (12).spa
dc.relation.referencesRomer, P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94 (October).spa
dc.relation.referencesSarmiento, E. (2002). El modelo propio. Bogotá, D.C.: Grupo Editorial Norma - Editorial Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería.spa
dc.relation.referencesSarmiento, E. (2011). Transformación productiva y equidad. Bogotá, D.C.: Editorial Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería.spa
dc.relation.referencesSarmiento, E. (2014). Distribución del ingreso con crecimiento es posible. Bogotá, D.C.: Editorial Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería.spa
dc.relation.referencesShiller, R. (2000). Irrational exuberance. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSolow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (february): 65-94. Reprinted in Stiglitz and Usawa (1969).spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, L. (2010). Maynard’s revenge. The collapse of free market macroeconomics. Cambridge y Londres: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesUzawa, H. (1961). On a two sector model of economics growth: I, Restud, vol. 28, February.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoung, A. (1928). Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal, 38, 527-542.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoung, A. (1995). The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 641-680.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.subject.armarcDesarrollo económico
dc.subject.armarcPolítica Industrial
dc.subject.armarcCapital
dc.subject.armarcIndustrialización
dc.subject.armarcCompetencia económica
dc.subject.armarcEconomic development
dc.subject.armarcIndustrial policy
dc.subject.armarcCapital
dc.subject.armarcIndustrialization
dc.subject.armarcEconomic competition
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem