Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Seismic assessment of framed buildings: a pseudo-adaptive uncoupled modal response analysis

dc.contributor.authorJerez Barbosa, Sandra Roció
dc.contributor.authorMEBARKI, Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T19:46:40Z
dc.date.available2023-06-14T19:46:40Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1363-2469spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/2414
dc.description.abstractThe Pseudo-Adaptive Uncoupled Modal Response Analysis proposed herein aims to estimate the seismic response of structures. In comparison to complete nonlinear time history analysis, the proposed method provides an acceptable accuracy with a reduced calculation time duration. It relies on the energy based approach to build the capacity curve and a pseudo-adaptive feature that considers changes in modal shapes after yielding. Low- and medium-rise reinforced concrete buildings are tested. The numerical results are in good accordance with the results obtained by a complete time history analysis. They are also compared to other existing methods and with available experimental measures.eng
dc.format.extent21 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Groupspa
dc.sourcehttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/13632469.2010.547649?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tabspa
dc.titleSeismic assessment of framed buildings: a pseudo-adaptive uncoupled modal response analysiseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación Estructuras y Materiales - Gimecispa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2010.547649
dc.identifier.eissn1559-808Xspa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/13632469.2010.547649?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tab
dc.publisher.placeReino Unidospa
dc.relation.citationendpage1035spa
dc.relation.citationissue7spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1015spa
dc.relation.citationvolume15spa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Earthquake Engineeringeng
dc.relation.referencesAntoniou, S. and Pinho, R. [2004] “Development and Verification of a Displacement-Based Adaptive Pushover Procedure,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8(5), 643–661.spa
dc.relation.referencesASCE [2000] Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.spa
dc.relation.referencesATC [1996] “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,” ATC - 40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.spa
dc.relation.referencesATC [2005] “Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures,” FEMA - 440, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Redwood City, California.spa
dc.relation.referencesBobadilla, H. and Chopra, A. K. [2007] “Modal pushover analysis for seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete special moment resisting frame buildings,” EERC 2007-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.spa
dc.relation.referencesCEN [2003] Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance; Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Commitee For Standardisation (CEN), Brusselsspa
dc.relation.referencesChintanapakdee, C. and Chopra, A. K. [2003] “Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 32(3), 417–442.spa
dc.relation.referencesChopra, A. K. [2007] Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.spa
dc.relation.referencesChopra, A. K. and Goel, R. [2001] “A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands on buildings: Theory and preliminary evaluation,” PEER 2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.spa
dc.relation.referencesChopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K. [2002] “A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31(3), 561–582.spa
dc.relation.referencesChopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K. [2004] “A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 33(8), 903–927.spa
dc.relation.referencesClough, R. W. and Penzien, J. [1993] Dynamics of Structures, McGraw Hill, Singapore.spa
dc.relation.referencesFajfar, P. [2007] “Seismic assessment of structures by a practice-oriented method,” in Extreme ManMade and Natural Hazards in Dynamics of Structures, ed. A. Ibrahimbegovic and I. Kozar (Springer, Netherlands), pp. 257–284.spa
dc.relation.referencesFajfar, P. and Gašperšic, P. [1996] “The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings,” ˇ Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 25(1), 31–46.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalasco, A., Lagomarsino, S., and Penna, A. [2006] “On the use of pushover analysis for existing masonry buildings,” Proc. of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (a joint event of the 13th. ECEE & 30th. General Assembly of the ESC). Vol. 1 (Paper 1080), Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1–10.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoel, R. K. and Chopra, A. K. [2004] “Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings,” Earthquake Spectra 20(1), 225–254.spa
dc.relation.referencesGupta, B. and Kunnath, S. K. [2000] “Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures,” Earthquake Spectra 16(2), 367–392spa
dc.relation.referencesHamza, S., Bonnet, G., and Delmotte, P. [2005] “Deterministic and stochastic approach in estimating the reliability of civil-engineering structures submitted to earthquakes,” Proc. of the 6th. International Conference on Structural Dynamics, Vol. 2, Paris, France, pp. 791–796.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaselton, C. B. and Deierlein, G. G. [2007] “Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment-frame buildings,” PEER 2007/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Montes, E., Kwon, O.-S., and Aschheim, M. A. [2004] “An energy-based formulation for first- and multiple-mode nonlinear static (pushover) analyses,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8(1), 69–88.spa
dc.relation.referencesJerez, S. and Mebarki, A. [2009] “Seismic assessment of buildings: proposal of a new modified uncoupled modal response history analysis,” Proc. of the 2nd. International Symposium on Computational Mechanics (ISCMII) in conjunction with the 12th. International Conference on the Enhancement and Promotion of Computational Methods in Engineering and Science (EPMESC XII), Vol. 2, Hong Kong - Macau, pp. 1642–1647.spa
dc.relation.referencesKalkan, E. and Kunnath, S. K. [2006] “Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering 132(11), 1721–1731.spa
dc.relation.referencesKirçil, M. S. and Polat, Z. [2006] “Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings,” Engineering Structures 28, 1335–1345.spa
dc.relation.referencesKwon, O.-S. and Elnashai, A. [2006] “The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structures,” Engineering Structures 28, 289–303.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, T.-H. and Mosalam, K. M. [2006] “Probabilistic seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structural components and systems,” PEER 2006/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, Q. and Ellingwood, B. R. [2005] “Structural response and damage assessment by enhanced uncoupled modal response history analysis,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 9(5), 719–737.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, Q. and Ellingwood, B. R. [2007] “Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock-aftershock earthquake sequences,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36(3), 405–427.spa
dc.relation.referencesPEER [2005] “Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: NGA Database,” University of California, Berkeley; http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/.spa
dc.relation.referencesPinto, A., Verzeletti, G., Molina, J., Varum, H., Pinho, R., and Coelho, E. [2002] “Pseudo-dynamic tests on non-seismic resisting RC frames (bare and selective retrofit frames),” EUR20244, European Laboratory for Structural Assessment, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.spa
dc.relation.referencesSucuoglu, H. and Günay, M. S. [2011] “Generalized force vectors for multi-mode pushover analysis,” ˘ Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 40(1), 55–74.spa
dc.relation.referencesTjhin, T., Aschheim, M., and Hernández-Montes, E. [2006] “Observations on the reliability of alternative multiple-mode pushover analysis methods,” Journal of Structural Engineering 132(3), 471–477.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
dc.subject.proposalEarthquake Engineeringeng
dc.subject.proposalSeismic Assessmenteng
dc.subject.proposalPushover Analysiseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Seismic Assessment of Framed ...
Tamaño:
2.111Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Artículo de revista
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem