Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Mebarki
dc.contributor.authorJerez Barbosa, Sandra Rocio
dc.contributor.authorMatasic, Igor
dc.contributor.authorProdhomme, Gaëtan
dc.contributor.authorReimeringer, Mathieu
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-10T21:50:31Z
dc.date.available2021-11-10T21:50:31Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1877-7058
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/1833
dc.description.abstractThis study deals with industrial accidents and domino effects that may occur in an industrial plant, the initial accident being supposed to take place in any of the tanks either under or at atmospheric pressure. This initial sequence might generate sets of structural fragments, fire balls, blast waves as well as critical losses of containment (liquid and gas) that threaten the surrounding facilities and may cause serious damages. The structural fragments, the blast wave and the fire ball can be described following database and feedback collected from past accidents. The vulnerability of the potential targeted tanks is investigated in order to assess the risk of propagation of the first sequence of industrial hazard. Cascading sequences of accidents, explosions and fires can take place, giving rise to the domino effect. This risk of domino effect occurrence is investigated herein. The interaction and the behavior of the targets affected or impacted by the first explosion effects are described by adequate simplified mechanical models: perforation and penetration of metal fragments when they impact surrounding tanks, as well as global failure such as overturning, buckling, excessive bending or shear effects, etc. Sensitivity analysis is performed thanks to Monte Carlo simulations: the probability of impact and risk of failure of target tanks are reported. A comparison between risks due to blast wave and fragments impacts is performed.eng
dc.description.abstractEste estudio trata de los accidentes industriales y los efectos dominó que pueden producirse en una planta industrial, suponiendo que el accidente inicial tiene lugar en cualquiera de los tanques, ya sea a presión atmosférica o bajo ella. Esta secuencia inicial puede generar conjuntos de fragmentos estructurales, bolas de fuego, ondas expansivas, así como pérdidas críticas de contención (líquido y gas) que amenazan las instalaciones circundantes y pueden causar graves daños. Los fragmentos estructurales, la onda expansiva y la bola de fuego pueden describirse siguiendo la base de datos y la información recogida de accidentes anteriores. Se investiga la vulnerabilidad de los posibles tanques objetivo para evaluar el riesgo de propagación de la primera secuencia de peligro industrial. Pueden producirse secuencias en cascada de accidentes, explosiones e incendios, dando lugar al efecto dominó. Aquí se investiga este riesgo de aparición del efecto dominó. La interacción y el comportamiento de los objetivos afectados o impactados por los primeros efectos de la explosión se describen mediante modelos mecánicos simplificados adecuados: perforación y penetración de fragmentos metálicos cuando impactan en los depósitos circundantes, así como fallos globales como el vuelco, el pandeo, los efectos de flexión o cizallamiento excesivos, etc. El análisis de sensibilidad se realiza gracias a las simulaciones de Monte Carlo: se informa de la probabilidad de impacto y del riesgo de fallo de los tanques objetivo. Se realiza una comparación entre los riesgos debidos a la onda expansiva y a los impactos de fragmentos. Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor www.DeepL.com/Translatorspa
dc.format.extent8 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherScience Directspa
dc.rights© 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltdeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705812031499spa
dc.titleExplosions and Structural Fragments as Industrial Hazard: Domino Effect and Riskseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.description.notesa Université Paris-Est, Laboratoire Modélisation et Simulation Multi Echelle, MSME, UMR 8208 CNRS, 5 Bd Descartes, 77454 Marne-La-Vallée, France b INERIS, Institut National de l’Environnement Industriel et des Risques, Parc Technologique ALATA, BP 2 - 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, Franceeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupEstructuras y Materialesspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.137
dc.publisher.placeChinaspa
dc.relation.citationendpage166spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage159spa
dc.relation.citationvolume45spa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalProcedia Engineeringeng
dc.relation.ispartofjournal2012 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technologyeng
dc.relation.referencesAbbasi, T. and Abbasi, S.A, 2007. The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE): Mechanism, consequence assessment, management. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141: 489-519spa
dc.relation.referencesARIA base of BARPI, France ( www.aria.environnement.gouv.fr )spa
dc.relation.referencesHolden P.L., 1988. Assessment of missile hazards: Review of incident experience relevant to major hazard plant. Safety and reliability directorate, Health & Safety Directorate.spa
dc.relation.referencesLees F.P., 2005. Prevention in process industries, Butterwort Heinemann,spa
dc.relation.referencesAntonioni G., Spadoni G. and Cozzani V. Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22: 614-624spa
dc.relation.referencesCozzani V. Salzano E, 2004. The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure- Part I: Probit models, Journal of Hazardous Materials, A107: 67–80.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarhavilas P.K., Koulouriotis D. and Gemeni V, 2011. Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites : On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000-2009. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(5): 477-523.spa
dc.relation.referencesMébarki A., Mercier F., Nguyen Q.B., Ami Saada R., 2009. Structural fragments and explosions in industrial facilities. Part I: Probabilistic description of the source terms, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22: 408–416.spa
dc.relation.referencesMébarki A., Mercier F., Nguyen Q.B., Ami Saada R. , 2009. Structural fragments and explosions in industrial facilities. Part II: Probabilistic description of the source terms, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22: 408–416.spa
dc.relation.referencesMébarki A., Mercier F., Nguyen Q.B., Ami Saada R., Meftah F. Reimeringer M, 2007. A probabilistic model for the vulnerability of metal plates under the impact of cylindrical projectiles. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20: 128–134.spa
dc.relation.referencesMébarki A., Mercier F., Nguyen Q.B., Ami Saada R., Meftah F., Reimeringer M, 2008. Reliability analysis of metallic targets under metallic rods impact: Towards a simplified probabilistic approach. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 21: 518– 527.spa
dc.relation.referencesMingguang Z. and Juncheng J, 2008. An improved probit method for assessment of domino effect to chemical process equipment caused by overpressure. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 158: 280 – 286.spa
dc.relation.referencesTalaslidis D.G., Manolis G.D., Paraskevopoulos E., Panagiotopoulos C., Pelekasis N. and Tsamopoulos J.A. , 2004. Risk analysis of industrial structures under extreme transient loads. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24: 435-448.spa
dc.relation.referencesMébarki A., Genatios C., Lafuente M., 2008. Risques Naturels et Technologiques : Aléas, Vulnérabilité et Fiabilité des Constructions – vers une formulation probabiliste intégrée, Presses Ponts et Chaussées, ISBN 978-2-85978-436-2, Paris.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.subject.armarcAccidentes de trabajospa
dc.subject.armarcExplosionesspa
dc.subject.armarcTanques de almacenamientospa
dc.subject.armarcStorage tankseng
dc.subject.proposalIndustrial accidentseng
dc.subject.proposalExplosionseng
dc.subject.proposalDomino effecteng
dc.subject.proposalAtmospheric tankeng
dc.subject.proposalTank under pressureeng
dc.subject.proposalFailure riskeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd